Monday, April 7, 2008
Extra Credit
Basically, this project was good in teaching me the things I need to know for the course as well as relating them to personal experiences and feelings. This will, inevitably, allow me to remember the theories, etc, in the future because of their personal connection that I have made.
Also, it introduced me to concepts I would have never encountered without doing external research.
I enjoyed the flexibility and creativity of this project, although it was a really large endeavor for such a short period of time. And I think it would be more reasonable in an electricity and internet friendly environment in the future. But, overall, it was a good way to review and be introduced to new perpectives in psychology!
Entry 10
–noun
1.
a study of an individual unit, as a person, family, or social group, usually emphasizing developmental issues and relationships with the environment, esp. in order to compare a larger group to the individual unit.
2.
A detailed analysis of a person or group in a psychological study.
Case Study: Luke StormoGipson
Sunday, April 6, 2008
Entry 9
The phenomenological perspective of psychology was first practiced by Wilhelm Wundt, who developed the idea of introspection (where an individual would actually record and evaluate their own subjective thoughts). This became an important aspect of the psychodynamic approach to realizing what one's unconscious thoughts were, and how they controlled one's behavior. However, humanistic psychologists in the mid twentieth century took Wundt's theories to another level by stressing the validity of subjective experiences to one's own free will, and how we shape our own self-actualizing development.
Like the humanisitic perspective, the phenomenological notes how everyone is good by birth, and on a path towards perfection no matter what. All humankind strives for some kind of growth and maturity in life, with a final, end result being a more whole, complete person. Thus, it focuses on the more positive and open apects of anyone's life, and thier achievements towards gaining a clear outlook on their true self.
"The major themes and underlying assumptions of this perspective are:
There is a ‘self’ which has beautiful and unique form.
It is changing and growing. Everyone’s self is unique.
Once we provide a nurturing outer and inner environment, growth towards our higher selves occurs naturally.
We have enormous potential, possibility, and choice.
Uniqueness of Individuals: we view the world from our own unique perspective and our subjective experience of reality is very important. Phenomenology means 'the subjective experience of individuals'.
We can and must exercise our free will. Some people think that they don’t have the capacity or ability to make life HAPPEN for themselves. Or they believe that past problems are insurmountable. Or they spend so much time regretting the past that they are blinded to the possibilities of the here and now and the future. This perspective takes the view that this is due to people losing sight of the free will they possess and not recognizing their own potential for change and growth." (Neill 5).
As an ever-growing individual I see myself having unlimited potential. I know, personally, I have changerd throughout the years. Just over the past year, after coming to India and opening my eyes to so many amazing experiences, I have matured and seen not only the beauty and optimistic side to myself, but also the wonders of everything around me (not to sound cheesy, but it's true!). Becoming more independent, secure, creative and caring has been the biggest part of my time here, and I feel like these parts of my newer, changing attitude and personality are what will help me get through the next four years at university and the rest of my adult life. In essence, the things I have learned and been exposed to in just 10 months will stay with me the rest of my life. And, although these experiences are very personal and subjective, they affect and will continue to affect my behavior unless something changes them in the future. But I am happy now with myself, content to be this way, but also willing to change (because, as my dad told me before I left, "The only thing in life that is permanent is change.").
At the time being, my inner environment (as mentioned above) is very nurturing and unique. My outer environment could do some work, and in the months to come I will be adjusting to very dramatic changes when I get back home and then take off to college a couple months later. So, until I settle down again (in about 6 months) my external relationships and stimuli will not be very suitable for spontaneous or self-sustained growth (according to this perpective), but I will encounter challenges and experiences that will motivate me to develop in ways I have yet to think of. That's why this period of transition is so necessary for me: I will be living life first hand without much adult supervision, simply because I am an adult; simply because I am unique; simply because I have free will! I CAN'T WAIT!
Sources:
Neill, James. Introduction to Phenomenological Perspectives on Personality. 2003. http://wilderdom.com/personality/L10-0PhenomenologicalPerspectivesPersonality.html Using the sources:
(Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Perspectives on personality (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Funder, D. C. (1997). The personality puzzle. New York: Norton.
Keutzer, C. S. (1978). Whatever turns you on: Triggers to transcendental experiences. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 18, 77-80.
Maslow, A.H. (1970). Motivation and Personality (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand.)
Digital Scrapbook. "Graduation." Word Art. http://store.digitalscrapbookplace.com/ images/wordart/04_Graduation_WordArt_Sample.jpg
McClamrock, Ron. "Dilbert: 'Free Will'." Cartoon. http://profron.net/fun/Dilbert_FreeWill.gif
CWU. "Wilhelm Wundt." Picture. http://www.cwu.edu/~warren/images/Wundt3.jpg
Sunday, March 23, 2008
Entry 8
Infed. "Carl Rogers." Sketch. http://www.infed.org/images/people/ rogers_wikipedia_commons.jpg
Boeree, George C. "Conditional Positive Regard." Diagram. http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/ incongruity1.gif
View Images. "Crying Baby." Picture. http://cache.viewimages.com/xc/72342667.jpg?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=D7D5341DF8CB2C3624C0F336234D6573284831B75F48EF45
Lichtenstein. "Love." Printed Art. http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/singleout/library/Roy-Lichtenstein-Kiss-V-133905.jpg
Entry 7
Entry 6
Karen Horney was one of the leading researchers on the impact of childhood trauma in adult neurosis, and came up with theories suggesting how people develop neurosis. First of all, neurosis is a psychological way of coping with life or a specific situation that isn't traditionally "normal", or that is traumatizing. For some adults, neurosis is a way of bearing childhood burdens (like the memories of molestation or negligence). However, most people experience neurosis because of what Horney calls "the basic evils", which are parental actions towards children that cause a barrier of coldness or isolation between them and their kids. It's the lack of wanting, caring or love in an early child's relationships that is truly scarring (not necessarily beatings or verbal abuse). Occasions when these evils are most evident include (but are not limited to) when parents favor one sibling over another; humiliation of the child by the parent; broken promises; unfair punishment for small mistakes; and the parents' erratic behavior towards or around the child.
I have two sisters who are older than me, and growing up as the youngest child I always felt that my parent preferred them over me. I understand now that they didn't, but it wouldn't be hard to comprehend why parents favor silbings over another: older siblings are more mature and less obnoxious/uncompliant, or younger siblings may get more attention because they "need" it more than older kids. In any case, I felt that they favored my sisters for the sole reason that my sisters got to do things I wasn't allowed to do all the time. Since my sisters are 5 and 10 years older than me, I see my parents' logic behind keeping me from doing the same things they did (like go to scary movies with friends, or get more allowance, or go places by myself). But back then I thought it was just because they didn't like me, and therefore wouldn't let me be an "individual". I threw tantrums and never got what I wanted. "How come Kate gets to go!?!?" "Why does Rachel get to eat that?!?!" "What did I ever do to deserve this?!?!" As a grown person, in retrospect, it all makes sense to me, and I am not permanently scarred, because the reasons behind the parental restraint were rational.
My mom used to humiliate me a lot. I love her to bits, but when I was younger I remember she used to do things that she knew pushed my buttons, but would make her laugh all the same. Example "A": For a halloween party one year, when I was in the insecure middle school pre-pubescent stage of my life, my mom showed up in a "nerd" costume I specifically told her not to wear. Her response, "It will be fine, honey!" But I knew it could end in disaster. And when she arrived, I was embarrassed out of this world. However, like she said, it was all good, and people enjoyed the humor in her costume choice. Now I have learned to accept my mom (and whole family for that matter) for their quirkiness and things that I realize that I have also picked up over the years.
My parents never really made promises to be broken in the first place. But I know that some parents, in order to settle their kids down, or to lighten the mood, will tell their kids one thing, and not follow through with it. For example, if some kids really want to go to a water park, their parents might promise them that they can go later that week, getting the childrens' hopes up, and then not actually go, or make up excuses why they can't. This can be crushing, especially for little kids who don't understand the intention behind the broken promise, and it certainly isn't meant to be purposefully devastating from the parents' points of view.
I remember the good old days of getting spanked for things I did that I thought, at the time, were perfectly reasonable. I would do something like talk back to my parents, waiving it off as "freedom of speech", until I realized that isn't true in a household where parents reign. Then I would be punished "unfairly" for what I said. At the time I wasn't happy about this at all. My parent's were doing stuff to me that wasn't justified. But now I realize what a brat I was, and I can cope internally with the rational consequences I recieved. My parents were only trying to teach me that my behavior was unacceptable, which is was, but I didn't realize that at the time.
My family hasn't always been the most organized, composed or punctual family. When we would go on family trips, just getting out the door was a hassle, and everyone's erratic behavior with last-minute packing and scrambling to put everything in its place was almost unbearable. We are still a very scattered, hectic, dynamic family. But that's what I love about us! Growing up I just got used to this behavior and dealt with it accordingly: i joined right in. However, I know some kids might be overwhelmed or frightened by the erratic nature of their parents, traumatizing them for life. Growing up where it was normal, and using the same techniques of erraticism as an adult, I appreciate it and it allows me to be more spontaneous and forgiving of crazy mistakes or unwanted mishaps.
Sources:
Karen Horney Powerpoint. Mataji Sharma. 2008
Crux and Flux. "Punishment." Cartoon. http://www1.istockphoto.com/ file_thumbview_approve/1119816/2/istockphoto_1119816_punishment.jpg
Britannica. "Karen Horney." Picture. http://cache.eb.com/eb/image?id=61953&rendTypeId=4
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Entry 5
Sources:
Glassman, William E. and Marilyn Hadad. Approaches to Psychology. New York: Open University Press, 2004.
Mark Parisi. Cartoon. Off the Mark. http://www.offthemarkcartoons.com/cartoons/1994-11-10.gif
Odiham Community. Sketch. OTMG. http://www.odihamcommunity.org.uk/system/files/ images/Acting.jpg